First, some observations from my most recent trip. The eye popping differences began with the flights. As it happened, we flew Lufthansa over and United back. No surprise: Lufthansa won hands down. The Lufthansa Airbus A340-600 was new, staff was courteous (and gorgeous), food good, even in coach the silverware was metal, and alcohol, including good wine, was available without additional charge. The United return was an aging Boeing 767 in bad need of an overhaul (as was the staff), alcohol was extra, and halfway through the flight the bathroom was out of toilet paper and remained so the rest of the flight.
We flew into Munich where the escalators all worked, the luggage carousels purred, and the rental cars were all BMWs, Mercedes, Audis, and VWs in excellent condition. When we landed back in Newark, somewhat depressed by the return flight experience, the first escalator we encountered was, appropriately, not working.
Of course, tourists usually see the best of what a locale has to offer. But the same can be said of where I live in the US. I spend nearly all my time in areas that cater to tourists and are analogous to the areas I’ve visited in Europe. ( I know, pinch me!) That said, I am blown away by the level of construction and the quality of the properties in Europe. You cannot even compare high-end construction in the US with the same level in Europe. What we call the finest door or window in the US wouldn’t even qualify for a shed in prosperous parts of Europe. The same can be said for just about every detail in high-end construction. Europeans build for the long run. In the US, most of what we build is disposable and reflects that.
Infrastructure in Europe also wins hands-down over the US. Trains throughout Europe are superior, even in the indebted countries like Italy and Spain. They run on schedule, go fast, and can take you (and your bike and dog) just about anywhere. Roads, funiculars, cog railways, and even hiking trails have been built and are maintained to an amazing degree in the most inhospitable of places. Autobahns are plenty smooth at even 100mph. You can hike for hours up just about any mountain in the Alps, and chance upon ancient Inns that are only accessible by foot (or now helicopter), and get a beer, a delicious meal, a hot cappuccino, and often a room.
On the technology front, again a mismatch. I’m proud that much technology originated in the US, but Europe has adopted it as well as anywhere. Smart phones, computers, and broadband internet are ubiquitous. Some things however haven’t made it the other way across the pond. Anyone who’s stayed in a European hotel knows that the key card must be inserted before the power goes on. How many coal fired plants could we do without if we adopted this simple idea? European waitstaff enter orders digitally and remotely, accept credit cards remotely, and hence can serve more tables more efficiently than we can with our centralized and more manual systems. I believe this is a consequence of the European custom where the waitstaff works for the restaurant and is paid a salary, versus the US custom where the waitstaff largely works for the diner via tips (a system I prefer as a diner, btw). Seems to me better efficiency would benefit restaurants and diners, but this technology has not been adopted in the US.
Back when I first visited Europe in 1974, the rap on the old world was that you couldn’t find decent toilet paper and the commode would likely be a hole in the floor. No more. On this trip I encountered a public bathroom halfway up a mountain, in Italy no less, that practically wiped your bum for you. Electronic toilets, electric doors, faucets that both washed and dried your hands, and door handles that changed color to indicate occupancy. It was a level of technology and excellent design in a public restroom I’ve never seen anywhere in the US.
So, how is Europe able to have bigger government, more redistribution, more regulation, hence less economic freedom, and at the same time produce tangible things that are superior to ours? The answer is that they do not necessarily have less economic freedom. Despite the best intentions of our founders, in many ways Europeans today are the economically freer people!
For twenty years now The Heritage Foundation has published a ranking of countries based on economic freedom. At current standing the US is #12. Switzerland is #4. Overall, four European countries beat the US: Switzerland, Ireland, Denmark, and Estonia. Of the top twenty, ten are European. And yet, I believe Heritage understates Europe’s economic freedom and overstates ours.
Wherever you go in Europe you see things you would never see in the US. Swimming pools have diving boards, hotels have trampolines, and in the Alps, parapenters (hang gliders) and squirrel suit flyers are everywhere. Sometimes people die or are injured doing these things, but Europeans are free to take these risks, and businesses are free to offer these experiences. A tort system that supports litigious actions effectively limits our freedom in the US without specific laws banning behavior. I once tried to rent a mountain bike in NJ but was told insurance rates due to litigation made that impossible. The result is a loss of freedom and economic freedom. Heritage does not account for the effects of our tort system and our lawsuit culture on economic freedom.
Also, remember how we were supposed to be the country specifically designed to have limited government and unprecedented liberty? Remember how that was the thing that made us “exceptional”? Well, according to my calculations, six European countries have more limited government than we do, and some of them are prosperity powerhouses: Switzerland, Slovakia, Estonia, Poland, Ireland, and Norway (which is tied with the US). Moreover, three more are within the margin of error: Luxembourg, Czech Republic, and the industrial powerhouse of Europe, Germany.
(*This is a larger list than the one Heritage arrives at. See note at the end for a full explanation of the method I use versus the one Heritage uses.)
Sure, not everything in Europe is awesome. There are slums in Europe just as there are in the US. Having fast trains, nice buildings, great cars, and amazing infrastructure doesn’t create a classless society. To do that you have to go full Socialist, or full Communist, and then you end up with none of the above, except of course the slums and a few grand palaces.
Here’s the upshot:
Europe is highly decentralized, being made-up of sovereign nations, often with semi-autonomous regions within those nations. The US is now highly centralized with states that have fewer rights than ever in our history. Decentralized systems are inherently more resilient. Europe is a place where you can find limited government, reasonable regulation, democracy, human rights, personal accountability, prosperity, freedom, rule-of-law, etc. all in one place, though certainly not everywhere. The US is a place where you cannot find all those things to that degree in a single place thanks to centralization. Advantage Europe.
Europe now does its redistribution in the right place thanks to the Euro - away from the political entity that prints most currency (The ECB). The US redistributes at the federal level where it also prints it’s currency setting up a fatal conflict of interests. Advantage Europe.
Europe is a place where citizens can drive as fast as they please, but they are accountable. The US is a place where the federal government dictates driving speeds. Europe is a place where public swimming pools have diving boards, hotels have trampolines, and citizens are accountable to use them responsibly. The US is a place without public diving boards or trampolines, its citizens denied those freedoms except in private. Advantage Europe.
Europe produces better stuff, and in many ways, a better standard of living. They just do. Much of this is cultural, but the result is undeniable. The proof is in the pudding as they say. Advantage Europe.
I used to maintain that the US was a place with unmatched adherence to the rule of law, a constitution that protected our rights, limited government, economic freedom, and a future second to none. Now I admire Europe. (With a caveat for demography, although ours isn’t looking too good either!)
*Note on government spending: My ranking of government spending differs from Heritage’s in two ways: I compare government spending (federal, state, and local) to just the private sector portion of GDP for all countries. Heritage uses both the public and private part of GDP, which is problematic especially in measuring the US, which has been on a money printing, borrowing, and stimulus binge. To correct for this, I consider only the private portion of GDP (GDP less Government Spending).
Also, Quantitative Easing is not specifically accounted for in Heritage’s government spending numbers. I do include it because it is government spending.
For a full explanation of my method see “The True Tax Rateis 70%!”
All numbers come from the OECD (Organization for EconomicCo-operation and Development) data. (not all European countries participate in the OECD)