Even in a business like economic forecasting and reporting,
which is known for being particularly dodgy, this discrepancy is unusual. But there may be a simple, though not
comforting, explanation for this wild swing.
Consider that the official definition of a recession is two
consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. Therefore, the lower the first quarter, the easier it will
be to avoid the “R” word when the second quarter is reported. For example: if the first quarter had actually been
-1.5% and the second quarter comes in again at -1.5%, that would ring the
recession bell and the overall 2014 GDP would be -1.5%. But if the GDP really is -1.5% after
two quarters, and the first quarter is reported as -2.9%, then the second
quarter can be reported as +1.4%, and no recession will have officially
occurred! Call it the immaculate
recession.
Now you might be saying, “that’s ridiculous , the Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BEA) is a highly respected non-partisan government agency
which would never manipulate official numbers to benefit incumbents during an
election year!” Yeah, tell that to
the victims of the IRS, FDA, FBI, INS, DOJ, NLRB, NTSB, Fish and Wildlife, etc,
etc, etc.
Update: Oh, and remember this? Census "faked" election 2012 jobs report.
Update: Oh, and remember this? Census "faked" election 2012 jobs report.