I’m done. I
will not support you if you seek the presidency in 2016, even though I did so
quite enthusiastically in the past.
Look, I have nothing but respect for you. I’ve even made phone calls on your behalf, donated to your
campaigns, and argued your merits to anyone who’d listen. And I still think you’d make an
exceptional president! But, the
fact is, at least for this supporter, you have disqualified yourself as a
candidate. Here’s why:
Mr. Romney, you’re a businessman right? Let me pose some hypothetical questions to you: Would you hire a CEO who
had legitimate access to the trade secrets of his competitors yet refused to
learn from them? If you owned a
football team, would you hire a head coach who had legitimate access to his
opponent’s playbook but failed to study it?
Those trade secrets and playbook are readily available in
the writings of Saul Alinsky. Have
you read them? Have you studied
them? Have you devised counter
tactics? I seriously doubt it
because you’ve been blind-sided time and again by Alinsky tactics. Ever since Bill Clinton, Democrats have
won every election in which they stuck closest to the Saul Alinsky
playbook. If you had absorbed
those lessons and understood how to counter them you might have won. Instead, you naively ran
straight into an Alinsky buzzsaw.
To this day, I’m not sure you understand how you were Alinsky-ed.
Just about every turning point in the last campaign hinged
on Alinsky tactics. The “war on
women”, binders full of women, dogs on car roofs, the 47% kerfuffle, ads about
the woman who died of cancer, the haircut story, the car lift, the horse, and
on and on were all straight out of the Alinsky playbook. Even the Candy Crowley debate fiasco
was manageable had you understood Alinsky.
Then there were the unforced errors, which again could have
been avoided with a basic understanding of Alinsky. “Obama’s a nice guy, but he’s in over his head.” “Obama didn’t cause the financial crisis,
he inherited it.” “Obama deserves
credit for getting bin Laden.” All
examples of huge unforced errors.
If you’d like a detailed accounting of why these were the wrong things
to say, (aside from them being flat wrong!) please read my post mortem from
December 2012, “Why Romney Lost”.
Here’s another hypothetical: If you were hiring a marketing executive, would you hire
someone who had unfettered access to free advertising but failed to use
it?
Ever since Ronald Reagan, Republicans have won every
election in which they understood that the news media, entertainment media, and
academia would be aligned against them, and that they therefore must go
straight to the voters - especially to their base! You sir had unfettered access to conservative talk radio, a
medium that reaches millions of Republican base voters each day, and you gave
them the Heisman!
I witnessed you passing up these gimmees throughout your
time on the national political stage, and it made me want to tear my hair
out. I simply can’t take it
anymore. (Plus, I’m running out of
hair.)
Mr. Romney, you’re an amazingly accomplished person. You are no dummy. But you’re a “saint”, a Mormon Bishop,
and you are ill equipped for the devils domain of today’s Alinsky
politics. Hillary or no
Hillary, 2016 will be all Alinsky all the time. Sorry Mitt, this ain't your game. No mas.
Regards, Ron Reich
undiepundit.com
P.S. Dear reader, please forward this to any Republicans you
know in the hope that someone in Romney’s circle might perhaps see it and save
us, and him, the humiliation of another embarrassment!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Behave.