Donald Trump continues to create firestorms by asserting he likely won the popular vote - if illegal votes are deducted. Meanwhile, one of the reasons millions of women protested was that they asserted Hillary Clinton should rightfully be president because she won the popular vote.
All of this raises some interesting questions. Did illegals vote? If so, how many? Could it be enough to swing the popular vote? And, should we even look at the popular vote?
2106 Election Results Map
The two maps above amount to prima facie evidence that Donald Trump has a point regarding illegals voting. Of the 13 states and districts (including Washington D.C.) that issue driver's licenses to unauthorized immigrants, 12 of them voted for Hillary Clinton. That's a whopping 92%!
Only Utah bucked the trend, but that's because Utah requests a picture ID or equivalent, and the driver's license they issue to unauthorized immigrants is distinctly different from the one issued to citizens.
This occurred during a year when the Democrat candidate won only 21 states (including D.C.), 12 of which, or 57%, were states that issue driver's licenses to unauthorized immigrants. The odds of this being a coincidence are astronomical.
It's not a coincidence. Democrats have been on a decades long mission to encourage unauthorized immigrants to come here and vote. The reason is simple; immigrants overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
To further this along, Democrat President Bill Clinton signed a law in 1993 known as the Motor Voter Bill, which basically automated voter registration for anyone applying for a driver's license or other government benefit. The loophole is that illegals are now registering to vote in massive numbers, particularly in states that issue them driver's licenses.
Here's a picture of Bill Clinton signing the Motor Voter bill. Notice the two people standing directly behind him? They are Francis Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, in the green and grey respectively, two radical Columbia University professors who advocated collapsing the U.S. by overloading it with dependents and immigrants.
And here is Barack Obama, who studied at Columbia University while Cloward and Piven held court there, answering a question with only one correct answer. The question is essentially, "should illegals be afraid to vote?" His answer should have been, "they shouldn't vote because it's illegal". That's not what he says though.
This occurred during a year when the Democrat candidate won only 21 states (including D.C.), 12 of which, or 57%, were states that issue driver's licenses to unauthorized immigrants. The odds of this being a coincidence are astronomical.
It's not a coincidence. Democrats have been on a decades long mission to encourage unauthorized immigrants to come here and vote. The reason is simple; immigrants overwhelmingly vote Democrat.
To further this along, Democrat President Bill Clinton signed a law in 1993 known as the Motor Voter Bill, which basically automated voter registration for anyone applying for a driver's license or other government benefit. The loophole is that illegals are now registering to vote in massive numbers, particularly in states that issue them driver's licenses.
Here's a picture of Bill Clinton signing the Motor Voter bill. Notice the two people standing directly behind him? They are Francis Fox Piven and Richard Cloward, in the green and grey respectively, two radical Columbia University professors who advocated collapsing the U.S. by overloading it with dependents and immigrants.
And here is Barack Obama, who studied at Columbia University while Cloward and Piven held court there, answering a question with only one correct answer. The question is essentially, "should illegals be afraid to vote?" His answer should have been, "they shouldn't vote because it's illegal". That's not what he says though.
Link: HERE
So, should we even care about the popular vote?
Of course not. How many Trump voters stayed home in states like California, New York, and Illinois because they knew their votes were meaningless in states that hadn't chosen a Republican since cars had cranks? Both candidates would have run completely different races if the popular vote had been the goal. You simply can't hold an election based on one set of rules and then scream foul when your candidate would have won based on some other hypothetical set of rules.
Think how this would work in sports. The baseball World Series winner is determined by a best-of-seven series of games, and this year the Chicago Cubs won four games to win the series. But in the popular vote of runs scored, it was a tie! Sometimes the losing team outscores the winner over the whole series, but they still lose, and no one claims otherwise.
Same in football, where the only thing that matters is outscoring the opposing team at the end of an hour. Sometimes the team that loses has more offensive yards, dominates the clock, completes more passes, forces more turnovers, etc. But they still lose.
So, how many illegals and non-citizens voted? There is absolutely no way to ever know because by Democrat design, voting is done almost entirely on the honor system. No citizenship records are kept. That leaves only maps and circumstantial evidence - like this:
2106 Election Map Showing Democrat Concentrations Near Border Crossings and Routes
(Hat Tip: @Military4Trump on Twitter)
Perhaps the most telling aspect of voter fraud is that Democrats have worked tirelessly to allow it. They have promoted policies like loose registration, early voting, mail-in ballots, no photo I.D., no citizenship I.D., no oversight at polling places, and provisional balloting. Meanwhile, Democrats have universally opposed every single proposal to ensure integrity in the voting system.
Donald Trump has a point, he should investigate, and he should work to ensure integrity in the voting system. If not, he and every Republican from now on will lose the popular vote, and probably the Presidency as well.
